Cesar Ramirez Gutierrez v. Bertram S. Griggs, Superintendent, California Institution for Men at Chino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 14 courts need not determine whether habeas corpus petitioners properly exhausted 15 noncognizable claims
• Rule 4 “explicitly allows a district court to dismiss summarily the petition on the merits when no claim for relief is stated”’
• Rule 4 “explicitly allows a district 7 court to dismiss summarily the petition on the merits when no claim for relief is stated”
• Rule 4 “explicitly 4 allows a district court to dismiss summarily the petition on the merits when no claim for relief is 5 stated”
• Rule 4 “explicitly 3 allows a district court to dismiss summarily the petition on the merits when no claim for relief is 4 stated”
• Rule 4 “explicitly 3 allows a district court to dismiss summarily the petition on the merits when no claim for relief is 4 stated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).