Skip to main content
· 7/13/2005

Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Winestone

Citations

  • 182 S.W.3d 342
  • 2005 Tenn. App. LEXIS 515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[O]ur holding above . . . pretermits Lloyd’s final argument, since a specific request for contribution and indemnification would not affect the outcome of this appeal.”
  • “An insurance company may refuse to honor an assignment made without its permission.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holly M. Kirby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.