Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Garmin International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by “refusing to sift through the voluminous exhibits in order to match the assertions in [defendant- appellant’s] motion to his supporting documentation”
• finding no abuse of discretion where the district court “refus[ed] to sift through the voluminous exhibits in order to match the assertions in [the defendant’s] motions to his supporting documentation”
• “The Court will not sift through the record in an attempt to find a genuine issue of material fact or locate arguments.”
• “[I]n reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we do not consider materials not before the district court.”
• “the district court acted well within its discretion in setting aside the unwieldy mass of data that [the party] attempted to rely on without providing correct, specific references in accordance with the local rules”
• “[T]he district court acted well within its discretion in setting aside the unwieldy mass of data that Mr. Bartle attempted to rely on without providing correct, specific references in accordance with the local rules.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).