Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Future Asbestos Claim Representative (In Re Kaiser Aluminum Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \the Bankruptcy Court is regulating access to the information because of privacy concerns\ and that 2019 Orders struck \appropriate balance\ between maintaining public's right of access and \ensuring that the information is not misused\
• describing “type of direct, pecuniary interest contemplated by the ‘aggrieved person’ test,” and distinguishing “incidental costs applying] to anyone seeking access to the Rule 2019 information”
• finding lack of standing as insurer appellants had not moved for access

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).