Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Cooperman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiffs' equitable claims were time-barred because its legal claims were time-barred under statute of limitations
• affirming trial court's determination that, where legal claims for statutory theft and conversion were time barred, \the plaintiffs' equitable claims based on the same facts also [were] time barred\ [emphasis added]
• ‘‘[t]he question of whether a party’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• ‘‘[t]he question of whether a party’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).