Skip to main content
· 12/21/2005

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. ABB Lummus Global, Inc.

Citations

  • 337 B.R. 22
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37829
  • 2005 WL 3480022

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “the Court must apply mandatory abstention and remand the action to state court”
  • case remanded where was no basis to find the action could not be timely adjudicated in state court
  • “timely adjudication” factor satisfied where the dispute is not intertwined with a pending bankruptcy proceeding, is not complex, and is the type of dispute that the state court can adjudicate in a timely fashion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koeltl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.