Certain-Teed Piping Materials, Inc. v. Hydroaire, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the plaintiff “did not have leave to file any old amended complaint that it wished to file—it had permission to file its Proposed Complaint”
• striking amended pleading which significantly differed from the proposed amendments attached to the Motion to Amend
• rejecting notion that order granting leave to amend following telephone conference granted leave “to file any old amended complaint,” when court had relied upon different tendered amended complaint than that which was filed
• \Dover did not have leave to file any old amended complaint that it wished to file—it had permission to file its Proposed Complaint.\
• “Dover did not have leave to file any old amended complaint that it wished to file — it had permission to file its Proposed Complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).