Cerilli v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Constitution does not waive the Government's sovereign immunity in a suit for damages
• holding that equitable relief may be available in cases of “continuing negligence”
• holding defendant liable for publishing a statement that “can reasonably be viewed as either fact or opinion” would impose a chilling effect on speech
• holding defendant liable for publishing a statement that \can reasonably be viewed as either fact or opinion\ would impose a chilling effect on speech
• \(T)he standard for awarding a judgment n. o. v. is the same as that applied when ruling on a motion for a directed verdict.\
• purportedly equitable action is not one for damages if it cannot be satisfied by the payment of money

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).