Cerezo-Martin v. Agroman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims of improper maintenance and installation are governed by negligence law, not the NJPLA
• holding that because reasonably anticipated use includes foreseeable misuse, a duty exists to warn against foreseeable misuses of a product
• noting that issue of objective foreseeability of manner of misuse is for jury to decide
• finding that claims for harm caused by negligent installation and maintenance where distinct from PLA claims for harm caused by a defective product based on an alleged failure to warn

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).