CERES MARINE TERMINALS v. Armstrong

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the burden of proving that medical fees are excessive is placed on the employer
• explaining that a medical bill is prima facie evidence that the charges comply with the Act and its standard “prevailing community rate” requirement
• noting that “[u]nder our Rules, we only address arguments encompassed by an appellant’s express ‘assignment[s] of error’ in his brief”
• noting that the employer did not assign error to a ruling of the Commission and that “[u]nder our Rules, we only address arguments encompassed by an appellant’s express ‘assignment[s] of error’ in his brief”
• noting, in an appeal from the Commission, that “[u]nder our rules, we only address arguments encompassed by an appellant’s express ‘assignment of error’ in his brief”
• “A significant omission . . . will result in waiver of the argument on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).