Skip to main content
· 3/20/1882

Cereghino v. Hammer

Citations

  • 60 Cal. 235
  • 1882 Cal. LEXIS 433

Syllabus

<p>Guabantz—CoirsTBuerioir of Contbaci.—The defendant executed to the plaintiff two guaranties, one in the words and figures following, and the other similar except in the name of the debtor. ‘ ‘ I do hereby guarantee the payment of this bill against P. * * * (provided said P. acknowledges the amount herein as correct) payment to be made out of the proceeds of his crop for the season of 1876, on or before October I, 1876.</p> <p>Held: The guaranties sued upon are conditional. The obligation assumed by the guarantor did not extend beyond the amount which should be by him received from the crop clear of incidental expenses. It was for the plaintiff to establish that the condition had happened which made the defendant liable.</p>

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.