Skip to main content
· 4/13/1978

Cercone v. Cercone

Citations

  • 386 A.2d 1
  • 254 Pa. Super. 381
  • 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2560

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding defendant was required to specifically deny factual allegations in complaint where defendant is in position to know truth or falsity of allegation
  • finding defendant was required to specifically deny factual allegations in complaint where defendant is in position to know truth or falsity of allegation
  • finding defendant was required to specifically deny factual allegations in complaint where defendant is in position to know truth or falsity of allegation
  • finding defendant was required to specifically deny factual allegations in complaint where defendant was in position to know truth or falsity of allegation
  • finding defendant was required to specifically deny factual allegations in complaint where defendant is in position to know truth or falsity of allegation
  • finding appellant could not rely on Rule 1029(c) where she clearly would have sufficient personal knowledge to admit or deny if she individually received funds from appellees that she promised to repay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Watkins, President Judge and Jacobs, Hoffman, Price, Van Der Voort and Spaeth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.