· 4/13/1978
Cercone v. Cercone
Citations
- 386 A.2d 1
- 254 Pa. Super. 381
- 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2560
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding defendant was required to specifically deny factual allegations in complaint where defendant is in position to know truth or falsity of allegation
- finding defendant was required to specifically deny factual allegations in complaint where defendant is in position to know truth or falsity of allegation
- finding defendant was required to specifically deny factual allegations in complaint where defendant is in position to know truth or falsity of allegation
- finding defendant was required to specifically deny factual allegations in complaint where defendant was in position to know truth or falsity of allegation
- finding defendant was required to specifically deny factual allegations in complaint where defendant is in position to know truth or falsity of allegation
- finding appellant could not rely on Rule 1029(c) where she clearly would have sufficient personal knowledge to admit or deny if she individually received funds from appellees that she promised to repay
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Watkins, President Judge and Jacobs, Hoffman, Price, Van Der Voort and Spaeth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.