Ceramic Enterprises, Inc. v. Dexion Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to apportion reasonable expenses pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(C) “given the mixed results of the motion and the history of discovery disputes”
• leaving each party to bear its own costs \given the mixed results of the motion and the history of discovery disputes in which neither side has consistently prevailed\
• emails from Plaintiff to family members that contained legal strategy and drafts of legal letters were protected by work product doctrine
• work product protection applied to emails that were clearly prepared in anticipation of litigation by client shared with his close relatives
• “work product protection is waived only when documents are used in a manner contrary to the doctrine’s purpose”
• “It is well-established that voluntary disclosure of confidential material to a third party waives any applicable attorney- client privilege.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).