Cephus v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court’s denial of motion for recusal based on allegations that the judge was “biased because of her ‘political-religious connections’ and her alleged loyalty to those who selected, confirmed, and appointed her”
• dismissal with prejudice justified where complaint “does not provide fair notice to the defendants of the claims against them” and “appears to be frivolous on its face”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).