Cephus Bell v. Eastman Kodak Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the mistake of filing a Rule 60(b) motion instead of a timely appeal did not justify relief
• finding that ineffective assistance of counsel is not proper grounds for collaterally attacking a civil judgment
• finding that ineffective assistance of counsel is not proper grounds for collaterally attacking a civil judgment
• explaining that overlooking or misinterpreting evidence is not appropriate ground for Rule 60(b) relief
• explaining that overlooking or misinterpreting evidence is not appropriate ground for Rule 60(b) relief
• noting that “no statute, or principle of federal common law, forbids a district judge to reconsider an order that she issued when she was a magistrate judge of the same court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).