Ceola v. Burnham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• chart amount upheld where appellant’s monthly net income was $17,659.65

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Riddick v. Harris
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2016-09-21· cited 20×
• Davis v. Bland
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2006-09-14· cited 10×
• Lee v. Lee
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2006-04-12· cited 8×
• Huey v. Huey
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2005-02-23· cited 7×
• Morehouse v. Lawson
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2006-03-08· cited 3×
• Fischer v. Fischer
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2015-02-25· cited 2×
• Kemp v. Kemp
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2011-05-11· cited 1×
• Montez v. Montez
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2019-02-06· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2003-05-28· cited 46×
• Smith v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-06-08· cited 27×
• In re Administrative Order Number 10
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-01-31· cited 2×