Centron Dpl Company, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Tilden Financial Corporation, a New York Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting that there was no meeting of the minds where party knew or had reason to know of the other party’s intended meaning of the agreement
• noting that, in the case of misunderstanding “where only one party knows or has reason to know of the different meaning attached by the other, that party is bound by the other party’s meaning”
• “In the absence of . . . critical factual determinations, we must vacate the judgment of the district court and remand for reconsideration with instructions to make more complete factual findings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).