Centro De La Comunidad Hispana De Locust Valley v. Town of Oyster Bay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the state court’s factual conclusion that restraints were not visible was reasonable because there was no evidence to the contrary
• “There is no clearly established federal law holding that jury instructions based 26 on the Arizona Supreme Court’s narrowing construction are inadequate.”
• “There is no 10 clearly established federal law holding that jury instructions based on the Arizona Supreme 11 Court’s narrowing construction are inadequate. . . .”
• “As to Dixon’s continued interest in the DNA suppression issue . . . Dixon’s interest in the issue was not so bizarre or obscure as to suggest that Dixon lacked competence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).