Central Wisconsin Trust Co. v. Barter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the imposition of a $150 fine on counsel was an appropriate sanction for a violation of F.R.C.P. 37 without amounting to contempt
• imposing greater amount of costs, and a fine, on the co-counsel primarily responsible for client’s discovery violations, but suggesting that all counsel of record have duty to supervise one another in the best interests of their client
• imposing greater amount of costs, and a fine, on the co-counsel primarily responsible for client's discovery violations, but suggesting that all ↩ counsel of record have duty to supervise one another in the best interests of their client
• discovery authority and rationale for imposition of fine where attorney’s fee sanction is not enough
• “[A] court may impose sanctions upon an attorney … includ[ing] fines payable to the court.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).