Skip to main content
· 4/28/2008

Central Valley General Hospital v. Smith

Citations

  • 75 Cal. Rptr. 3d 771
  • 162 Cal. App. 4th 501
  • 2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that mere possession of a trade secret does not constitute misappropriation
  • “[M]isappropria- tion requires a greater showing than mere possession by a defendant of trade secrets where the defendant acquired the trade secret by proper means.”
  • “that threatened misappropriation of trade secrets may be enjoined is the law of California despite the rejection of the inevitable disclosure doctrine by California courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.