· 4/28/2008
Central Valley General Hospital v. Smith
Citations
- 75 Cal. Rptr. 3d 771
- 162 Cal. App. 4th 501
- 2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 624
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that mere possession of a trade secret does not constitute misappropriation
- “[M]isappropria- tion requires a greater showing than mere possession by a defendant of trade secrets where the defendant acquired the trade secret by proper means.”
- “that threatened misappropriation of trade secrets may be enjoined is the law of California despite the rejection of the inevitable disclosure doctrine by California courts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dawson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.