Skip to main content
· 11/23/1925

Central Union Telephone Co. v. City of Edwardsville

Citations

  • 269 U.S. 190
  • 46 S. Ct. 90
  • 70 L. Ed. 229
  • 1925 U.S. LEXIS 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The best interpretation of the cases, together, is that state procedure may be followed so long as it affords a reasonable opportunity to assert federal rights.”
  • “The best interpretation of the cases, together, is that state procedure may be followed so long as it affords a reasonable opportunity to assert federal rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taft

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.