Central Texas Cattle Co. v. McGinness

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Texas court could not exercise personal jurisdiction over the plaintiffs alleged conversion of cattle because all the defendant’s actions with regard to the cattle occurred outside of Texas

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pervasive Software, Inc. v. Lexware GMBH & Co. KG
  Fifth Circuit· 2012-07-20· cited 256×
• Capital Pacific, L.L.C. and B. Scott Fuller v. Jeffrey D. Boyd
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2005-11-03

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• International Shoe Co. v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
• World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson
  Supreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
• Hanson v. Denckla
  Supreme Court· 1958-10-13· cited 7,025×
• Schlobohm v. Schapiro
  Texas Supreme Court· 1990-02-14· cited 687×
• Kawasaki Steel Corp. v. Middleton
  Texas Supreme Court· 1985-09-18· cited 618×
• Roberson v. Robinson
  Texas Supreme Court· 1989-04-19· cited 559×
• Burnett v. Motyka
  Texas Supreme Court· 1980-11-05· cited 293×
• Zac Smith & Co. v. Otis Elevator Co.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1987-07-08· cited 216×
• O'Brien v. Lanpar Company
  Texas Supreme Court· 1966-02-02· cited 208×
• City of San Antonio v. Rosow
  Supreme Court· 1988-02-22· cited 45×