Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Plaintiff v. Bellmont Trucking Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting employer’s argument that the MPPAA did not apply to involuntary withdrawal caused by employer’s bankruptcy
• alleged \unjust enrichment\ to the Fund does not preclude withdrawal liability where statute clearly imposes such liability upon the employer
• alleged “unjust enrichment” to the Fund does not preclude withdrawal liability where statute clearly imposes such liability upon the employer
• “the enumeration of specific exclusions from the operation of a statute is an indication that the statute should apply to all cases not specifically excluded.”
• “Withdrawal liability tends to compensate for the shrinkage of the contribution base that occurs when the number of employees on whose behalf contributions are made decreases.”
• “ ‘the enumeration of specific exclusions from the operation of a statute is an indication that the statute should apply to all cases not specifically excluded.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).