· 4/1/1992
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Cross-Appellees v. Lady Baltimore Foods, Inc., Cross-Appellant
Citations
- 960 F.2d 1339
- 15 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1065
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6013
- 1992 WL 63202
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that Congress might be unable to overturn final judgments without “invad[ing] the judicial power of the United States, which Article III of the Constitution confides to the federal courts exclusively”
- \[m]uch modern legislation involves targeting government largesse on politically influential groups and the burdens of government on politically impotent ones\
- “[m]uch modern legislation involves targeting government largesse on politically influential groups and the burdens of government on politically impotent ones”
- “[T]he general rule honored even by interpretive literalists is that if a literal reading would produce an absurd result the interpreter is free (we would say compelled) to depart in the direction of sense.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Manion, Van Sickle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.