Skip to main content
· 12/14/1995

Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Cross-Appellee v. The Sherwin-Williams Company

Citations

  • 71 F.3d 1338
  • 19 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2336
  • 76 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 8070
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 35273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[The] sale of a subsidiary’s stock is a form of corporate ‘division.’ ”
  • “[The] sale of a subsidiary’s stock is a form of corporate ‘division.’ ”
  • “The district court concluded that [the losing party’s position was substantially justified], because this is a case of first impression with decent arguments on each side. That assessment strikes us as sensible; certainly it is not an abuse of discretion.”
  • calling § 1398 a “savings clause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Kanne, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.