Central State Bank v. Hudik-Ross Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Rule 4:67-5 permits a court to direct that a matter brought on an order to show cause proceed as a plenary action
• “The rule that contracts may be reformed where there has been mutual mistake is ‘well settled in our jurisprudence.’ ”
• \The rule that contracts may be reformed where there has been mutual mistake is `well settled in our jurisprudence.'\
• “[Pjarol and extrinsic evidence is admissible in a suit to reform the terms of a written instrument on a claim of mutual mistake, without regard to whether the writing is in fact ambiguous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).