Central Realty Corp. v. Allison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “it seems to be well settled that a resolution is not a law, and in substance there is no difference between a resolution, order, and motion”
• under appropriate circumstances, validity of municipal ordinances may be tested by certiorari, declaratory judgment proceedings, habeas corpus, injunction, mandamus, prohibition, and quo warranto

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McKenzie v. CITY OF FLORENCE
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1959-05-14· cited 27×
• Bob Jones University, Inc. v. City of Greenville
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1963-12-11· cited 26×
• State Ex Rel. Condon v. City of Columbia
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-02-14· cited 23×
• Lominick v. City of Aiken
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1964-03-12· cited 8×
• LA SALLE NATIONAL BK. v. the Thresholds
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-04-03· cited 7×
• Pinckney v. City of Beaufort
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-08-11· cited 5×
• Glasscock Company, Inc. v. Sumter County
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-11-01· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Carden v. Spilman
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1847-09-15· cited 132×
• Butler v. Ellerbe
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1895-07-06· cited 11×
• Cleveland v. City Council of Spartanburg
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1899-01-03· cited 10×