· 6/15/1893
Central Railroad v. Tunison
Citations
- 55 N.J.L. 561
- 26 Vroom 561
- 27 A. 929
- 1893 N.J. LEXIS 24
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The motion to quash herein merely went to defects apparent upon the face of the indictment. No proof was produced to show that these witnesses were not sworn.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Syckel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.