Skip to main content
· 6/15/1893

Central Railroad v. Tunison

Citations

  • 55 N.J.L. 561
  • 26 Vroom 561
  • 27 A. 929
  • 1893 N.J. LEXIS 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The motion to quash herein merely went to defects apparent upon the face of the indictment. No proof was produced to show that these witnesses were not sworn.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Syckel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.