Skip to main content
· 2/21/1930

Central R. Co. of New Jersey v. Schick

Citations

  • 38 F.2d 968
  • 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2427

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing and remanding for reconsideration where it was impossible to determine whether a board order concerning chronic-condition impairment erroneously relied on “magic words”
  • discussing the type of evidence that will support a determination of significant limitation of repetitive use
  • reversing and remanding for lack of substantial reason in a chronic-condition-impairment case where it was impossible to determine if the board’s order rested on a legally incorrect premise
  • ‘magic words’ not required for ‘chronic condition’ rating when the record contained medical opinions from which it could be found the claimant was entitled to a ‘chronic condition’ award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Avis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.