· 5/28/1991
Central Production Credit Ass'n v. Hopkins
Citations
- 810 S.W.2d 108
- 15 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 631
- 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 740
- 1991 WL 90162
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[t]he intent to create a security interest in after-acquired property must be ascertained and judged by the language of the security agreement, not the financing statement!]”
- stating that “[t]he 4 The parties agree that Missouri law governs the disposition of Count I in accordance with the Sale Agreement’s choice-of-law clause. (ECF No. 5-5, PageID.45, ¶ 9). provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code may be varied by agreement”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hogan, Flanigan, Parrish
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.