Skip to main content
· 5/28/1991

Central Production Credit Ass'n v. Hopkins

Citations

  • 810 S.W.2d 108
  • 15 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 631
  • 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 740
  • 1991 WL 90162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[t]he intent to create a security interest in after-acquired property must be ascertained and judged by the language of the security agreement, not the financing statement!]”
  • stating that “[t]he 4 The parties agree that Missouri law governs the disposition of Count I in accordance with the Sale Agreement’s choice-of-law clause. (ECF No. 5-5, PageID.45, ¶ 9). provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code may be varied by agreement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hogan, Flanigan, Parrish

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.