Skip to main content
· 1/30/1905

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Chicago Portrait Co.

Citations

  • 122 Ga. 11
  • 49 S.E. 727
  • 1905 Ga. LEXIS 96

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting, in adopting referee’s and hearing panel's findings in attorney disciplinary proceeding, that the referee had rejected charges under D.R. 7-101(A)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cobb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.