Central Management Co. v. Industrial Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employer who 24 set fees to be charged, dictated where work was conducted, maintained an employee 25 dress code, and had authority to sanction employees for failure to follow its policies 26 exercised control over the details of the contractor’s work
• affirming award imposing single rather than dual liability because only cab company controlled details of the claimant’s work as cab driver
• where “operating taxi cabs was the usual and regular course of CMC’s business ... the claimant’s work was not only an integral part of that business — it was the essential core of CMC’s business.”
• “[T]he definition of employee should be liberally construed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).