Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Barranger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “there is no merger if each offense requires proof of an element the other does not.”
• holding burglary and criminal trespass do not merge
• holding burglary and criminal trespass do not merge
• When reviewing “[a] claim that crimes should have merged for sentencing purposes,” the “standard of review is de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).