Centra Health, Inc. v. Shalala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that it was arbitrary and capricious for the Secretary to claim that excluding data was infeasible because the Secretary had excluded that same data in the past and had not “adequately explained” the difference in treatment.
• finding that it was feasible for the Secretary to exclude certain hospital cost data from wage index calculations and that it was arbitrary not to do so because the Secretary had excluded that data for 1986 and 1996
• finding that it was feasible for the Secretary to exclude certain hospital cost data from wage index calculations and that it was arbitrary not to do so because the Secretary had excluded that data for 1986 and 1996
• “[T]he Act requires the [agency] to create an index that accurately represents the relative wage levels of hospitals in a given [area].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).