Skip to main content
· 1/13/1995

Centmehaiey v. Secretary of Department of Health

Citations

  • 32 Fed. Cl. 612
  • 1995 U.S. Claims LEXIS 16
  • 1995 WL 33735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, in a failure-to-warn case, \there will be no liability unless it be shown that the manufacturer failed to take the precautions that a reasonable person would take in presenting the product to the public\
  • stating that Ohio uses this restatement section
  • \[A] product may be unreasonably dangerous and strict liability may apply as the result of the lack of an adequate warning even though the product has no design or manufacturing defect.\
  • “[A] product may be unreasonably dangerous and strict liability may apply as the result of the lack of an adequate warning even though the product has no design or manufacturing defect.”
  • “Plaintiffs may plead both negligence and strict liability for failure to warn”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.