Centex Construction v. ACSTAR Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying amendment where admissions had not, as argued, “rested on a mistaken premise” such as to prevent presentation of the merits but were “based on a correct interpretation”
• “Virginia law provides no relief under a quantum meruit theory where a valid, express contract exists between the parties.”
• “Where the parties have entered into an express contract, they ‘are entitled to have their rights and duties adjudicated exclusively by its terms.’” (quoting Vollmar v. CSX Trans., Inc., 705 F. Supp. 1154, 1176 (E.D. Va. 1989)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).