Skip to main content
· 3/10/1989

Center v. Mad River Corp.

Citations

  • 561 A.2d 90
  • 151 Vt. 408
  • 1989 Vt. LEXIS 75

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there can be no recovery under quasi-contract theory when there is no inequity
  • where there is no evidence of inequity there can be no damages on quasi-contract theory
  • unjust enrichment award requires that defendant retain benefit under circumstances where it would be inequitable not to compensate plaintiff for its value

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Peck, Gibson, Dooley, Barney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.