· 3/10/1989
Center v. Mad River Corp.
Citations
- 561 A.2d 90
- 151 Vt. 408
- 1989 Vt. LEXIS 75
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that there can be no recovery under quasi-contract theory when there is no inequity
- where there is no evidence of inequity there can be no damages on quasi-contract theory
- unjust enrichment award requires that defendant retain benefit under circumstances where it would be inequitable not to compensate plaintiff for its value
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Peck, Gibson, Dooley, Barney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.