Center State Bank, Inc. v. State Banking Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding denial of departure where defendant cited his lack of significant criminal history, young age, the victim's willing participation, lack of harm to victim, and low chance of reoffending
• district court reviews mitigating circumstances and then weighs those circumstances against norm defined by legislature and any aggravating circumstances
• “[Ejach mitigating circumstance [is not] required to sufficiently justify a departure by itself, so long as the collective circumstances constitute a substantial and compelling basis for departure.”
• defendant cannot argue sentence categorically disproportionate in violation of Eighth Amendment by creating fact-specific categories relating to nature of offender and details of crime
• \[A] judge is not required to state the reasons a departure motion is denied.\
• \[A] judge is not required to state the reasons a departure motion is denied.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).