Eighth Circuit· 4/16/2012

Center for Special Needs Trust Administration, Inc. v. Olson

Citations

676 F.3d 688
2012 WL 1253280
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7536

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that case was not moot because state expressly reserved its right to apply the challenged regulation against plaintiff in the future
concluding that case was not moot because “North Dakota expressly reserved the right to apply its regulations against [plaintiff] in the future,” and plaintiffs had already suffered injury in the past
explaining that when Congress uses “particular language” in one section of a statute but different terminology in another, we “generally presume[]” Congress intended a difference in meaning
concluding that similar documents hold only persuasive value
finding a private right of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1396p(d)(4)(C)
finding a private right of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1396p(d)(4)(C)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Murphy, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.