Center for Policy Analysis on Trade & Health v. Office of United States Trade Representative

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a statutory requirement that a trade group be “fairly balanced” was unreviewable, in part because of the countless perspectives and categories of potential representatives
• applying § 701(a)(2) to bar judicial review where relevant statutes \are devoid of standards suggesting what Congress intended\
• finding FACA's fair balance requirement not reviewable in the particular scenario complained of because it provided \no meaningful standards to apply\ nor \articulate[d] what perspectives must be considered\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).