Center for Medicare Advocacy, Inc. v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that third-party material solicited by an agency “can therefore provide insight on the operations and factors under consideration by the agency”
• finding that third-party material solicited by an agency “can therefore provide insight on the operations and factors under consideration by the agency”
• finding that documents containing “advice, recommendations, and suggestions” are “protected from disclosure under the FOIA's deliberative process exemption.”
• conclusion that information sought concerned activities and operations undertaken by the government “is not altered by fact that some of the released documents were 28 brochures and pamphlets submitted by private parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).