Center for Legal Advocacy v. Hammons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “records” includes peer-review reports and quality-assurance records
• noting that the “defendants essentially concede that [a federal statute] preempts state laws”
• “When interpreting the language of a statute, the starting point is always the language of the statute itself.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• granting motion to seal pages containing medical records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).