· 9/18/2012
Center for Individual Freedom v. Van Hollen
Citations
- 402 U.S. App. D.C. 345
- 694 F.3d 108
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 19537
- 2012 WL 4075293
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding to the district court for arbitrary-and-capricious review when the district court resolved a case at Chevron step one without reaching the issue and when the agency’s position was not well developed
- remanding to the district court for arbitrary-and-capricious review when the district court resolved a case at Chevron step one without reaching the issue and when the agency’s position was not well developed
- remanding to the district court for arbitrary-and-capricious review when the district court resolved a case at Chevron step one without reaching the issue and when the agency’s position was not well developed
- remanding to the district court for arbitrary-and-capricious review when the district court resolved a case at Chevron step one without reaching the issue and when the agency’s position was not well developed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Edwards, Per Curiam, Randolph
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.