Center for Competitive Politic v. Kamala Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• crediting the Attorney General’s argument that “having immediate access to Form 990 Schedule B increases her investigative efficiency”
• rejecting the plaintiffs argument that the Attor ney General should obtain Schedules B through subpoenas alone because “reviewing significant donor information can flag . suspicious activity”
• “[N]o case has ever held or implied that a discbsure requirement in and of itself constitutes First Amendment injury.”
• movant \bears the heavy burden of making a 'clear showing' that it [i]s entitled to a preliminary injunction\
• movant “bears the heavy burden of making a clear 6 showing’ that it [i]s entitled to a preliminary injunction”
• finding no “actual burden” on First Amendment rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).