· 8/20/2014
Center for Community Action & Environmental Justice v. BNSF Railway Co.
Citations
- 764 F.3d 1019
- 44 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20191
- 2014 WL 4085860
- 78 ERC (BNA) 2085
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 16065
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- alleging emission of hazardous substances into the air, some of which was directly inhaled before they touched the ground, and some of which touched the ground before being re-entrained into the air by air currents
- the RCRA “was intended to provide two possible solutions to the discarded 1 materials problem” including “resource conservation [achieved] by reducing the amount 2 of waste generated[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fernandez, Smith, Murguia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.