Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Bureau of Land Management

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “(1) the Biological Opinion’s ‘no jeopardy’ and ‘no adverse modification’' determinations relied on protective measures set forth in a conservation plan not enforceable under the- ESA; (2
• “We cannot gloss over the absence of a cogent explanation by the agency by relying on the post hoc rationalizations offered by defendants in their appellate briefs.”
• \We cannot gloss over the absence of a cogent explanation by the agency by relying on the post hoc rationalizations.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).