Center for Biological Diversit v. Ken Salazar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 5 101 1947A 44041. generally, \our decisions at the preliminary injunction phase do not constitute the law of the case\
• rejecting reading of single regulation that was contrary to \obvious import\ of larger regulatory scheme
• “[W]e must interpret [a] regulation as a whole, in light of the overall statutory and regulatory scheme . . . .” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “The law of the case doctrine holds that ‘a court will 3 generally refuse to reconsider an issue that has already been decided by the same court or a higher court in the same case.’” (quoting Gonzalez, 677 F.3d at 389 n.4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).