Centennial Mortgage, Inc. v. Blumenfeld

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding third-party beneficiary status where third-party was involved in every aspect of the formation of the contract and contracting parties knew that third-party was the guarantor of the irrevocable line of credit at issue
• considering extrinsic evidence of circumstances surrounding formation of building renovation contract
• considering extrinsic evidence of circumstances surrounding formation of building renovation contract
• \A court does not examine the hidden intentions secreted in the heart of a person; rather it should examine the final expression found in conduct.\
• “A third party does not have the right to sue under a contract merely because he may derive an incidental benefit from the performance of the promisor.” (citing Harvey v. Lowry, 183 N.E. 309, 311 (Ind. 1932)
• “A third party does not have the right to sue under a contract merely because he may derive an incidental benefit from the performance of the promisor.” (citing Harvey v. Lowry, 183 N.E. 309, 311 (Ind. 1932)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).