Cenage Learning, Inc. v. Buckeye Books

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Lumping all the 'defendants' together for purposes of alleging connections to New York is ... patently insufficient.\
• “Lumping all the ‘defendants’ together for purposes of alleging connections to New York is . . . patently insufficient.”
• finding it “patently insufficient” to “[l]ump[] all the ‘defendants’ together for purposes of alleging connections to New York.”
• “Lumping all the ‘defendants’ together for purposes of alleging connections to New York is, however, patently insufficient.”
• “Lumping all the ‘defendants’ together for purposes of alleging connections to New York is, however, patently insufficient.”
• “Lumping all the ‘defendants’ together for purposes of alleging connections to New York is . . . patently insufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).