Skip to main content
· 5/16/1933

Cem Sec. Corp. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 28 B.T.A. 102
  • 1933 BTA LEXIS 1182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the multiple-offenses factor because the court upheld two counts of misconduct against the attorney
  • applying the 20 In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Starczewski No. 201,073-3 multiple-offenses factor because the court upheld two counts of misconduct against the attorney
  • attorney falsified documents to mislead for his own benefit
  • attorney falsified documents to mislead for his own benefit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arundell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.